How to Manage Curricular Efficiency

August 8, 2022

The following article is an excerpt from Start, Stop, or Grow? A Data-Informed Approach to Academic Program Evaluation and Management.

In its basic form, curricular efficiency measures, manages, and improves the units of education that can be delivered for a given amount of instructional cost and quality. The metric we recommend, as a start, is cost per student credit hour (SCH). Subsequent posts will introduce metrics that balance cost and quality of instruction. 

Calculating Instructional Cost

The math for calculating instructional cost per SCH is simple: instructional cost divided by SCH taught. This metric enables reasonably accurate comparisons across institutions, departments, programs, course levels, and courses. Let’s start at the bottom of this stack, with instructional cost per SCH.

Instructional cost is faculty wages and benefits, net of wages and benefits for non-teaching time, plus any consumables (e.g., lab supplies) used in the course. In this context, “cost” refers to what the institution pays to deliver a course, not what a student pays to take the course. Policy decisions heavily influence total instructional cost, the numerator of cost per student credit hour. These decisions also influence the denominator, setting guidelines for course credit hours and students per course.

Faculty Wage Levels

Wage levels are set in periodic policy decisions and are difficult to change in the short term. Wages for unionized faculty may be set for years under a collective bargaining agreement. While they are subject to great debate, changes in wages and benefits are often small from year to year; in theory, rising labor costs could be offset by improving efficiency.

Required Course Credit Hours

Policies also determine the number of course credit hours a faculty member should teach. The expectation varies widely, from zero for a prestigious researcher who wins substantial grants, to eight courses and twenty-four course credit hours per year for a typical community college professor.

Rounding Credit Hours

“Rounding:” Institutions may have policies on how to manage faculty loads when they do not divide evenly by standard course credit hours. A faculty member at one institution may be able to “round up” eleven course credit hours and declare that they have met their twelve-credit-hour target in a given semester. At another, they may be required to round down, and teach an entire additional three-credit course (for a total of fourteen course credit hours) to satisfy a twelve- credit-hour requirement.

Minimum Class Size

Minimum Students per Class: Many institutions have policies on the minimum number of students that must be in a class or section. Institutions may have the data and willpower to enforce these rules; or they may not have policies, timely reports to identify small courses before the add/drop date, or they may simply be unwilling to take on faculty and close small classes. Loose management of class size comes at a substantial cost.

As illustrated here, hundreds of courses may run with under five students, driving up cost per SCH. I am frequently surprised at the number of courses with just one student. However, most are independent studies, and faculty often receive little or no pay for overseeing this work. Excluding courses with one student, in the example above, over one hundred tiny courses remain; the cost to deliver these courses often exceeds $1,000 per SCH.

This is the first of four blog posts in my Curricular Efficiency series. In future blogs, I will be covering the following topics:

  • The actions you can take to better manage your courses
  • Additional tactical decisions that can improve CE
  • The impact that CE can have on a typical campus.

 


Start, Stop, or Grow? A Data-Informed Approach to Academic Program Evaluation and Management can be purchased through Amazon.

Robert Atkins

CEO AND FOUNDER OF GRAY DECISION INTELLIGENCE

Bob led Gray DI’s entry into the education industry and the development of Gray DI’s proprietary industry databases and service offerings. He has worked directly with many of Gray DI’s education clients, consulting with CEOs and CMOs on business strategy, pricing, location selection, curricular efficiency, and program strategy.

Related Posts

Gray Insights

How Universities Can Make Better Academic Program Decisions: A Data-Informed Framework

Academic program decisions have never been more complex, yet many institutions still rely on incomplete signals or long-standing assumptions. Enrollment shifts, evolving workforce needs, and growing pressure to demonstrate outcomes are forcing leaders to rethink how programs are evaluated. Discover the key signals and strategic framework institutions are using to make smarter academic program decisions.

Read More
Gray Insights

Why Enrollment Declines Don’t Automatically Mean Program Cuts

When enrollment declines, the instinct to cut can feel like the safest financial move. But what if that decision actually creates a larger budget hole? Many smaller programs remain contribution positive, support high-volume general education, and hold untapped growth potential, while teach-out costs and ripple effects across student credit hours can quietly erase projected savings. Before reshaping your academic portfolio, it may be worth asking whether the real issue is the program, or the data behind the decision.

Read More
Gray Insights

An AI Infrastructure Boom Fueling Opportunities for Higher Education

AI is not just reshaping classrooms and careers, it is reshaping the physical world. A historic surge in data center construction is driving new energy demands, workforce shortages, and emerging academic opportunities that few institutions are fully prepared for. The question is not whether this infrastructure moment will impact higher education, but how quickly you will respond.

Read More