Maximize Your Faculty Resources

October 29, 2024

Do you ever wonder if you are getting the most out of your full-time faculty? Your faculty would likely say they have plenty to keep them busy, but are you maximizing their time?

Let’s take a look at our fictional Contemporary University’s Math Department.

Compared to benchmarks, Contemporary U’s undergraduate Math courses do not have a similar full-time cost structure. Contemporary U allocates more full-time math faculty resources to upper-level math:  32% vs. 6%. Even more pronounced is the lack of full-time resources dedicated to 100-level math:  16% vs. 78%.

 

Math Dept: Cost Share by Course Level

Since Contemporary U’s 100-level math is largely adjunct-taught, these courses are half the cost per student credit hour (SCH) than benchmarks… but the DFW rate is almost three times higher than benchmarks.

 

Math Dept: Cost per SCH vs DFW Rate

Unsurprisingly, the Math department serves students across the institution. At the 100-level, less than 1% of student credit hours are produced by Math majors. Conversely, 68% of 400-level Math SCH are produced by Math majors. Note that only 2% of SCH taught in the Math department are generated at the 400-level. In essence, you are concentrating your highest-cost faculty resources across a very small percentage of total student credit hours, and your lowest-cost resources across a very large percentage of student credit hours.

 

 

So, what does it all mean? It looks like Contemporary U may have an opportunity to improve student outcomes and improve cost per SCH efficiency by redeploying their full-time faculty more evenly across course levels in the Math department.

This analysis of Contemporary University’s Math Department reveals a compelling opportunity to use benchmarking to optimize resource allocation. By strategically shifting full-time faculty towards lower-level courses, Contemporary University can potentially improve student success, reduce DFW rates, and enhance cost efficiency. This data-informed approach to faculty deployment empowers provosts, presidents, and CFOs to make informed decisions that positively impact both academic outcomes and institutional budgets.


Curious to discover how even the smallest changes to your resource allocation can lead to big impacts on your institution’s financial health? Check out our recent blog, Uncovering Hidden Economic Opportunities: Cost per SCH.

Elizabeth Higgins

VP, Decision Intelligence Analysts and Product

Related Posts

Gray Insights

Why Enrollment Declines Don’t Automatically Mean Program Cuts

When enrollment declines, the instinct to cut can feel like the safest financial move. But what if that decision actually creates a larger budget hole? Many smaller programs remain contribution positive, support high-volume general education, and hold untapped growth potential, while teach-out costs and ripple effects across student credit hours can quietly erase projected savings. Before reshaping your academic portfolio, it may be worth asking whether the real issue is the program, or the data behind the decision.

Read More
Gray Insights

An AI Infrastructure Boom Fueling Opportunities for Higher Education

AI is not just reshaping classrooms and careers, it is reshaping the physical world. A historic surge in data center construction is driving new energy demands, workforce shortages, and emerging academic opportunities that few institutions are fully prepared for. The question is not whether this infrastructure moment will impact higher education, but how quickly you will respond.

Read More