Is Your Academic Program Portfolio Missing Economic Analysis?

November 15, 2022

If you are looking outward to understand the markets for your academic programs, including student demand, employer needs, and competition, you are halfway there – and well ahead of many institutions that use little data or focus solely on employer demand for graduates. To complete a sound program evaluation, you also need to look inward at program economics and academic outcomes.

Markets Face Outward, Economic­­s­–Inward

Let’s avoid two common errors: focusing only on cost and confusing program margin with departmental margin.

First, many high-cost programs also have high margins. They may have lower tuition discounts (because of the type of student they attract), or a more efficient course structure that leads to a higher number of students per class – in effect the volume of students per class offsets the cost per class, leading to a lower cost per student credit hour delivered. So, cost, by itself, tells you very little about which courses or programs are generating or consuming margins.

The second error is confusing departmental and program economics.  Nursing programs often highlight both errors.  I have heard many colleges complain about the high cost of nursing “programs.”  This conventional wisdom about Nursing reflects the costs of the Nursing department, which are often high because of clinical requirements, instructor pay, and regulatory constraints on class sizes. So, I have been surprised to see that nursing programs usually have above-average margins.

The departmental analysis needs to include high-margin courses that nurses take outside of their department, such as introductory English. Including the revenue cost and margin for the nurses in these courses substantially increases program margins. Accreditors require that all undergraduate nurses take essentially the same courses. As a result, average class sizes are quite healthy, which offsets the higher cost per course. Program economics avoids these errors and gives you an accurate understanding of program revenue, cost, and margin.

Difference from Average Bachelor's Contribution Margin per Student Credit Hour

A sound program evaluation includes both a look outward toward market opportunity and inward toward program economics. Most programs make money, but knowing which ones have above-average margins and which are below will inform good decision-making. 

Mary Ann Romans

Associate Vice President, Marketing

Mary Ann creates, defines, and executes marketing strategy at Gray Decision Intelligence.

Related Posts

Gray Insights

Why Enrollment Declines Don’t Automatically Mean Program Cuts

When enrollment declines, the instinct to cut can feel like the safest financial move. But what if that decision actually creates a larger budget hole? Many smaller programs remain contribution positive, support high-volume general education, and hold untapped growth potential, while teach-out costs and ripple effects across student credit hours can quietly erase projected savings. Before reshaping your academic portfolio, it may be worth asking whether the real issue is the program, or the data behind the decision.

Read More
Gray Insights

An AI Infrastructure Boom Fueling Opportunities for Higher Education

AI is not just reshaping classrooms and careers, it is reshaping the physical world. A historic surge in data center construction is driving new energy demands, workforce shortages, and emerging academic opportunities that few institutions are fully prepared for. The question is not whether this infrastructure moment will impact higher education, but how quickly you will respond.

Read More